Take a random variable X with mean μ and finite variance σ2<∞. Without loss of generality, let μ=0 and σ=1. Then for M:=251∑i=125Xi, we have mean zero and variance 1/25.
Consider p:=P(∣M∣⩽2). We know from Chebyshev that p⩾0.99. Can we do better?
Claim. There exists p∗>0.99 such that p⩾p∗.
Proof. Let q:=1−p=P(∣M∣>2). Then q⩽0.01, and
251=E[M2]=E[M2;∣M∣⩽2]+E[M2;∣M∣>2]⩾4⋅P(∣M∣>2)=4q.
Suppose by way of contradiction that 0.99 were sharp. Take a sequence of random variables with qn→0.01. Here:
Both terms are non-negative and so must both approach zero. Since the events ∣Mn∣⩽2 and ∣Mn∣>2 both occur with a probability of at least 0.005 uniformly for sufficiently large n, we have:
that is, the conditional expectations approach zero too. Thus the sequence of Mn converges in distribution to the three-point distribution where M∈{−2,0,+2} almost surely. To fix the mean and variance, we must have:
M∞=⎩⎨⎧−20+2with probability 0.005with probability 0.99with probability 0.005
But that is impossible. Clearly, X cannot be degenerate (otherwise p=1>0.99). Thus the support of X contains at least two distinct points a<b, and so the support of M contains at least twenty-six distinct points (a+25k(b−a))k=025.
Above, we used the fact that while Chebyshev is tight, not every distribution (and indeed no distribution which saturates Chebyshev) can be attained by averaging 25 independent copies of a random variable. How close can we get?
Let Xa be the random variable taking on values:
Xa=⎩⎨⎧−a0+awith probability 2a21with probability 1−a21with probability 2a21
for values of a>50. Note that each Xa has zero mean and variance E[Xa2]=a2⋅1/a2=1. Among the 25 samples, let N+ and N− be the count of +a and −a respectively. Then Ma=251a(N+−N−).
The critical event is ∣Ma∣=251a∣N+−N−∣⩽2, so a∣N+−N−∣⩽50. Since a>50 and the N± are integers, this is equivalent to the event N+=−N−: write p(a)=P(N+=−N−).
This is continuous and increasing in a, and as a→50, p(a)→p(50)≈0.99007163. We can get arbitrarily close to this number, which means it is the best bound we can hope to achieve. Thus there exists some infimum satisfying 0.99<p∗⩽0.99007163.
Conjecture. The upper bound here is tight: p∗=0.99007163.